Henry Stanley (1795-1878) and his Rotary Stove
|
Henry
Stanley was the most important stove inventor and maker to emerge in
Vermont. His stoves sold nationwide and influenced many other
makers to imitate or attempt to improve on them. This
section of my old book manuscript
will serve as an introduction to his career. I wrote this post originally several years ago (August 2016), but a later attempt to extend it resulted in such a monumental formatting glitch that I had to take it down. I am bringing it back now because I have recently come across a really nice surviving example of a probably older Stanley Rotary on Facebook's Antique Stove Collectors' page, with numerous pictures and even a movie of the turntable top rotating smoothly and easily about 190 years after it first did, and even without the graphite lubricant advised.
EXTRACT
FROM CHAPTER FIVE OF “A NATION OF STOVES” MANUSCRIPT, c. 2012
An
even more successful example of a similar strategy [integration of
iron smelting, stove making, distribution, marketing, and sales]
did not enjoy the protection of distance from the main sources of
stove supply, but depended instead on the quality of its innovative
products, as well as on the dramatic improvements to internal
transportation that took place in the 1820s. These enabled a Vermont
machine-builder, Henry Stanley (b. 1795), to reach out and invade the
urban markets of the seaboard in head-to-head competition with
established manufacturer-wholesalers themselves.
Stanley,
originally a maker of wool-carding and cloth-dressing equipment in
the small, stagnant town of Poultney (about twenty-five miles south
of John
Conant in Brandon), turned disaster into opportunity in 1829 when a
fire destroyed his machine-building facilities and left him with
nothing but the foundry he had recently erected, reputedly the first
in the state to use anthracite as its fuel. So he started making
stoves, then just “coming into general use,” instead. At first
he manufactured from other designers' patterns, and also produced
prize-winning “handsome ... very light and smooth” cast-iron
cooking utensils which he sold through dealers on New York's Water
Street. Stanley relied on the Champlain Canal, completed in 1827 and
at its nearest just ten miles west of Poultney at Whitehall, New
York, to connect him with this market.1
By
1832 he had invented his own cooking stove, with a literally
revolutionary layout. It was quite unlike most others, which had
hardly any moving parts. But Stanley was a machinist, and his rotary
stove featured a crank-operated turntable top, which enabled the cook
to control cooking temperature by moving the pots closer to or
further away from the hottest parts of the fire, and, like Conant's
step-stove design a decade earlier, minimized heavy lifting
(Figure 5.#).
It was also craftily designed to permit the easy replacement of the
parts subject to the most wear, something important to win the
confidence of consumers buying an expensive new item of essential
household equipment and living tens or hundreds of miles away from
the maker. [See this
1834 advertisement in a Hudson Valley newspaper, for the
stove's many claimed advantages.]2
Stanley
acquired a blast furnace of his own, the
Mount Hope, about eight miles outside Fort Ann, New York,
a town on the Champlain
Canal south of Whitehall, thereby securing his pig iron supply. He
went on to establish sales outlets in Baltimore, Philadelphia, New
York, and Troy, run by other family members, and to become one of the
most distinctive and also successful stove makers in the emerging
national market of the 1830s.
A
part of Stanley's competitive advantage depended on the control he
enjoyed over all stages of manufacturing. His stoves' Albany
distributor claimed in 1838 that “the quality of the castings and
general workmanship of them, is unequalled by any other in this
country.” The best that other firms not doing their own casting
could promise at the time was that they gave careful directions to
the furnace or foundry making their stoves, and inspected the work in
progress. Stanley's production system was a variation on the usual
decentralized pattern, but with one crucial difference: furnace,
foundry, and factory were all owned and managed by the same few men,
and the transactions among them were all internal to the firm and
coordinated by it. Castings were packed flat in boxes and barrels at
the foundry, teamed to Whitehall, floated to the Hudson on their own
dedicated canal boat, the “Rotary,” and shipped downriver from
Troy for his brothers to assemble, finish, and sell at their
waterfront wholesale and retail depots.3
Sales
of Stanley's stoves spread far beyond the East Coast territories that
he supplied from his own foundry, because he also licensed his design
(at $5 per stove) to be made and sold in markets that he could not
easily reach. For example, 3,000 were produced in Cincinnati alone
between 1832 and 1839, where its local maker claimed that “in the
parts of the country where it had been introduced, it had superseded
all others.” [In
1837, his
dealer in Cleveland claimed that "Those who have used
them say that they are superior to any others."]
By the early 1840s the Stanleys were even making direct
sales in the Midwest
themselves: stove merchants in south-east Michigan were their
second-largest group of customers, after New York's, and they were
also doing a significant trade in Wisconsin and Illinois.4
But
they lost control of their overextended business at the pit of the
post-Panic depression in 1842. Henry Stanley was “enterprising”
and “intensely active,” though let down by a “want of caution”
-- or simply of luck. His firm came spectacularly unstuck, with
liabilities of $82,274 ($63.8
million at 2019
values,
using the GDP per capita method of comparison),
the largest business failure in the New York stove trade. This was
not the end of his career as a stove inventor, but from now on he
depended on other companies to licence his patents and make his
products. Ironically, by the time that Stanley's thirteen-year
experiment in vertical integration of all stages of manufacture and
distribution of stoves bit the dust, the pattern of business
organization that he had helped pioneer was becoming the industry's
new norm.5
1
Joseph Joslin, Barnes Frisbie, and Frederick Ruggles, A
History of the Town of Poultney, Vermont: From Its Settlement to the
Year 1875 (Poultney:
Journal Printing Office, 1875), pp. 53 [population], 95-97 [quote],
298; The
American Advertising Directory [1831],
p. 117, for his hollow ware.
2 Stanley's
key patents were “Cooking
Stove,”
7333X (1832), “Revolving Cooking Stove,” 9282X (1835) [lost in
the 1836 Fire at the Patent Office], and [same title], 91 (1836),
probably its replacement. The text of 91's is the same as
7333X's, a new copy of which Stanley would have supplied to the
Patent Office after the Fire, because he took advantage of the
destruction of earlier versions of his patent and a critical court
ruling on it to make it more litigation-proof in future. Stanley
& Co., Remarks
and Directions for using Stanley's Patented Rotary Cooking Stove:
For Sale at No. 50 S. Calvert-street Baltimore, by Stanley &
Co., and at No. 6 Chesnut-street, Philadelphia, by John P.E. Stanley
& Co. (Baltimore:
Sands & Neilson, 1834), for a full description in probably the
oldest surviving stove instruction-manual, essential because
Stanley's stove was so different in operation from any other. [Other
editions: 1833 Troy; 1834
Cincinnati; 1835 New York]
3
William W. Mather, Geology
of New-York (Albany,
NY: Carroll & Cook, 1843), Part
1, pp.
575-6; D. Kittle advertisement, Albany
Evening Journal 1
Feb. 1838, p. 1 [quote], cf. J. & A. Fellows ad., same page;
Stanley & Co.'s operations reconstructed from their 1843
Bankruptcy, Box 155, File 2099. The file is unusually rich,
including small debts for unpaid wages to laborers, farmers,
teamsters, and others in the villages along the Vermont-New York
border area where they were based, as well as to their trade
creditors in Troy, New York, and Baltimore. It also contains an
inventory of the Water Street depot in New York, which contained
both a steam-powered stove-finishing and assembly shop and the
varied assortment of completed stoves, spare parts, and kitchen
accessories vital for its wholesale and retail business. The
assessed value of the stock and equipment was almost $8,000.
4
Stanley
v. Whipple (1839),
reported in James B. Robb, compiler, A
Collection of Patent Cases Decided in the Circuit and Supreme Courts
of the United States (Boston:
Little, Brown & Co., 1854), Vol. 2, pp. 1-10, provides details
of his licensing arrangements and Cincinnati sales [quotation at p.
5]; Stanley Bankruptcy, Schedule A, 25 Feb. 1843, for the
geographical distribution of the firm's $32,000 worth of
outstanding trade accounts.
5
Stanley Bankruptcy, Schedule A, 25 Feb. 1843, for liabilities;
Joslin et al., History
of the Town of Poultney,
p. 353 [quote]. Stanley had moved to Albany by the time of his
1845 heating-stove patent 3876 (“Stanley's Coal Burner”), and
assigned it to Charles Eddy, a Troy stove maker, whose firm valued
it enough to reissue it in 1860 in order to maintain their exclusive
rights (Reissues 944, 958, and 1078). Stanley himself went into a
new business in Troy that also depended on high-quality
charcoal-iron castings, the manufacture of railroad car wheels –
Freedley, Leading
Pursuits,
p. 323.
* * *
See also, elsewhere in this blog:
- "The Pioneer Cooking Stove, Indiana, Late 1830s" -- a humorous recollection of a frontier family's acquisition of a rotary stove;
- "Vermont Stove Inventors, Inventions, and Their Makers, 1817-1850," from which most of this text was taken, and which provides much of the context; and
- "Who Invented the Step (or Jews Harp, Premium, or Horseblock) Stove?" -- also relevant because Stanley's stove was essentially a modified step stove.]
- "Henry Stanley's Rotary Stove and US Patent Law";
- "Rotary Stoves -- Henry Stanley's and Others'";
- "A Stovemaker Writes to his Customer: John A. Conant, the Brandon Iron Co., & Henry W. Miller, 1835-1838." -- much discussion about Conant's rotary stoves, patent issues with Stanley, etc.
I have one of the orginial design stoves, how many still exist and the value?
ReplyDeleteThe Williams House at Historic Deerfield in Deerfield, Mass. features the rotary top cook stove with 5 different size pot recesses and a small iron tool that turned the round plate by inserting it into one of two slots on the plate, itself. It looks quite similar to the last sketch, above, but the sketch does not show the two V-shap slots that would accommodate the iron tool for rotating the round plate. No photos are allowed inside any of the houses at Historic Deerfield, so I cannot provide one for this post.
ReplyDelete